Kathleen Eldergill has practiced law in Manchester, Connecticut since 1981.  She primarily represents plaintiffs in employment matters, civil rights claims and other civil litigation and has special expertise in litigating constitutional claims.  Kathleen graduated in 1976 from the University of Connecticut with highest honors and in 1981 from the University of Connecticut School of Law with high honors.  She is rated AV (the highest possible rating) by Martindale-Hubbell and has been selected as one of the top lawyers in her field by Super Lawyers, Best Attorneys Network and Best Lawyers in America.

Reported decisions include DiCicco v. Voccola, 325 F. Supp. 85 (D. Conn. 2004); Piscottano v. Murphy, 317 F. Supp. 2d 97 (D. Conn. 2004); Sartor v. Town of Manchester, 312 F. Supp. 2d. 238 (D. Conn. 2004);Town of Enfield v. Enfield Shade Tobacco, LLC, 265 Conn. 376 ( 2003) State v. Ball, 260 Conn. 275 (2002), LaPointe v. Windsor Locks Bd. of Educ., 162 F.Supp.2d 10, (D.Conn. 2001) Shelton Police Union, Inc. v. Voccola, 125 F.Supp.2d 604, (D.Conn. 2001), Meyers v. Cornwell Quality Tools, Inc., 41 Conn. App. 19 (1996);Sadloski v. Manchester, 235 Conn. 637 (1995); Schnabel v. Tyler, 230 Conn. 735 (1994); Tyler v. Schnabel, 34 Conn. App. 216 (1994); Sadloski v. Manchester, 228 Conn. 79 (1993); Schnabel v. Tyler, 32 Conn. App. 704 (1993); State v. Ball, 226 Conn. 265 (1993); Starr v. Commissioner of Environmental Protection, 226 Conn. 358 (1993); Lester v. Resort Camplands International, Inc. 27 Conn. App. 59 (1992); Killingly v. Connecticut Siting Council, 220 Conn. 516 (1991); Double I Ltd. Partnership v. Plan & Zoning Comm., 218 Conn. 65 (1991); Preston v. Department of Environmental Protection, 218 Conn. 821 (1991); Lewin v. United States Surgical Corporation, 21 Conn. App. 629 (1990); Zinker v. Doty, 907 F.2d 357 (2d Cir. 1990) and 637 F. Supp. 138 (D. Conn. 1986); Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Ct. Siting Council, 215 Conn. 474 (1990); Preston v. Connecticut Siting Council, 21 Conn. App. 85 (1990); Lewin v. United States Surgical Corporation, 21 Conn. App. 629 (1990); Preston v. Connecticut Siting Council, 20 Conn. App. 474 (1990); Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. DPUC, 210 Conn. 349 (1989); Dorman v. Satti, 862 F.2d 432 (2d Cir. 1988) and 678 F. Supp. 375 (D. Conn. 1988); Brady v. Town of Colchester, 863 F.2d 205 (2d Cir. 1988); Frost v. Chromalloy Aero. Tech. Corp., 697 F. Supp. 82 (D. Conn. 1988); Sadlowski v. Manchester, 206 Conn. 579 (1988); United States v. Rosario, 820 F. 2d 584 (2d Cir. 1987); Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Town of Sterling, 204 Conn. 551 (1987); Mumford Cove Assn., Inc. v. Town of Groton, 786 F. 2d 530 (2d Cir. 1986); State v. Ostroski, 201 Conn. 534 (1986); State v. Shifflett, 199, Conn. 718 (1986); Coollick v. Windham, 7 Conn. App. 142 (1986); State v. Stanley, 197 Conn. 309 (1985); State v. Pelletier, 196 Conn. 32 (1985); Acheson v. White, 195 Conn. 211 (1985); State v. McCulley 5 Conn. App. 612 (1985); Southland Corp. v. Vernon, 1 Conn. App. 439 (1984)